|
Page 1 of 2 
The Wolverton Bible [2nd Printing - With Free Bonus Postcard Set]
Price:
$24.99
here are legions of fans of the work
of Basil Wolverton, stretching across
many generations. There are admirers
of his earliest work in the comic
books, including “Spacehawk”
(which began to appear in 1940 in Target
Comics) and “Powerhouse Pepper,” the wacky,
off-the-wall humor feature Wolverton created in
1942 for Stan Lee’s Timely Comics.
There are fans of “Lena the Hyena, the ugliest
woman in Lower Slobovia,” the crazily hideous
image that was Wolverton’s winning entry in the
1946 contest United Features sponsored on behalf
of Al Capp’s “Li’l Abner” strip.
There are enthusiasts of Wolverton’s numerous
1940s caricatures of popular celebrities, done
for ad campaigns sponsored by assorted movie
studios, the NBC radio network, and for various
advertising agencies.
There are fanatics about his iconic (and, for
the time, almost disturbing) 1950s work for
Harvey Kurtzman’s comic-book version of MAD.
There are devotees of Wolverton’s nutty
1960s artwork done for Topps Chewing Gum,
images that appeared on numerous bubble gum
stickers, posters, and pinback buttons.
There are aficionados of the many 1970s-era
covers he did for the DC comic book Plop!, as well
as the work Wolverton did in the 1970s for the Al
Feldstein-edited version of MAD magazine.
And there are his younger fans, who rediscover
Wolverton’s work again and again, and select their
own newfound favorites from the many reprint
publications and lavish published tributes to
Wolverton’s work that have since appeared.
But it will surely come as quite a surprise to
many of these same fans that Wolverton actually
wanted the work contained in this volume, from
his Bible stories, to be what he is “best remembered
for.”
Wolverton was quite a unique artist, and not
only because of his drawing style, which Life magazine
once famously described as the “spaghetti
and meatball school of design.” Unlike virtually all
of his fellow comic-book contemporaries,
Wolverton did not live in the greater Manhattan
area, but rather resided in the Pacific Northwest
and relied on the U.S. mail to deliver his many
assignments. “no one else lived as far away as I
did. Publishers liked to have artists under their
thumbs at all times,” Wolverton told Dick Voll in
the interview published in an all-Wolverton issue
of Graphic Story Magazine (no. 14, Winter 1971-1972). “That had advantages for the artists,”
Wolverton said, “but I would rather have forgone
those things and have more freedom otherwise.”
Like many other artists, Wolverton had no formal
training, but unlike most other artists he never
tried to ape the styles of other cartoonists, even
the ones he admired. “Possibly it was a case of trying
to keep my work from looking like that of
others,” Wolverton has said. “Gradually I became
aware that my way of drawing was different.”
Also unlike many comic-book artists, Wolverton
considered himself to be primarily a comic artist,
with no secret longing to break into the fine arts,
do portrait painting, or escape the “comic-book
ghetto” by going into advertising work. He loved
the genre, with all of its perceived limitations.
Before becoming a cartoonist, Wolverton had
actually started out as a young Vaudeville performer
in theaters in Oregon and Washington.
“Eventually I heard or read,” recalled Wolverton,
“that a two-bit actor earns even less than a two-bit
cartoonist.” Early in his career Wolverton also
pitched several daily comic strips, but in spite of
several near-misses nothing panned out. Perhaps
it was just as well. Asked later what he felt more
comfortable doing, Wolverton replied that “I felt
more comfortable with comic book pages because
of greater experience with them. I dislike
repetition in drawing,
and daily strips have to
overlap somewhat.”
And not doing a daily
strip, Wolverton said,
gave him “a certain
freedom I wouldn’t
have had.”
Quite contrary to
what you might imagine
the man to be like
upon viewing what
would be termed his “secular” artwork, Wolverton
was a devout Christian, with rather conservative
values. This fact is in sharp relief to his 1950s
work for Kurtzman’s MAD, which is wonderfully
grotesque at the very least; some even considered
it to be phallic. (Of course, such observations
often say more about the beholder than the artist.)
It is true, however, that several panels from
“Meet Miss Potgold” (MAD no. 17, November
1954) actually had to be retouched for fear that
they were too sexually suggestive. “Sig Freud
would probably go raving mad over my stuff,”
Wolverton told Voll. “Some psychiatrist or editor
said my material wasn’t fit to publish because it
was rife with sex suggestions and symbols.” This
both disgusted and amused Wolverton, who always
claimed naiveté when it came to anything
untoward in his work. “I know I draw things that
look like all kinds of organs and glands,”
Wolverton said. “It’s like the monkey which, if he
pounded away for a million years, might accidentally
type out the ‘Star Spangled Banner’ lyrics.”
|